<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Fabelmans (2022)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thegoodsreviews.com/the-fabelmans-2022/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/the-fabelmans-2022/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-fabelmans-2022</link>
	<description>Watching and asking: Is It Good?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:03:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Hunter Allen		</title>
		<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/the-fabelmans-2022/#comment-801</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunter Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thegoodsreviews.com/?p=7444#comment-801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t know it was David Lynch when I saw it, and now that I do, I still don&#039;t care.  (I barely care about John Ford.)  That scene&#039;s grown on me anyway, a little, though I still think I&#039;d like to have seen more of &quot;Sammy Fabelman&#039;s&quot; actual early &lt;i&gt;career&lt;/i&gt;.

It&#039;s pretty good at being a kid&#039;s familial melodrama, though!  Williams is off-the-wall good--a very well-honed tool for her director, in that she&#039;s somehow both a figure of empathy and sometimes awe (sometimes, uh, redacted), and thornier feelings of reemergent contempt.  I do appreciate the rawness of this movie, even if it&#039;s half-memoir half-therapy.  I agree about the importance of paratext here.  I&#039;ve always had some vague notion about how great it would be if movies could be seen under blinded experimental circumstances, but this is one I&#039;d really love to have somehow seen people react to it without any names on it or (even more somehow) without a preexisting awareness of who Steven Spielberg is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know it was David Lynch when I saw it, and now that I do, I still don&#8217;t care.  (I barely care about John Ford.)  That scene&#8217;s grown on me anyway, a little, though I still think I&#8217;d like to have seen more of &#8220;Sammy Fabelman&#8217;s&#8221; actual early <i>career</i>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty good at being a kid&#8217;s familial melodrama, though!  Williams is off-the-wall good&#8211;a very well-honed tool for her director, in that she&#8217;s somehow both a figure of empathy and sometimes awe (sometimes, uh, redacted), and thornier feelings of reemergent contempt.  I do appreciate the rawness of this movie, even if it&#8217;s half-memoir half-therapy.  I agree about the importance of paratext here.  I&#8217;ve always had some vague notion about how great it would be if movies could be seen under blinded experimental circumstances, but this is one I&#8217;d really love to have somehow seen people react to it without any names on it or (even more somehow) without a preexisting awareness of who Steven Spielberg is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
