<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="https://publishpress.com/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Them! (1954)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=them-1954</link>
	<description>Watching and asking: Is It Good?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:21:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Stalcup		</title>
		<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Stalcup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thegoodsreviews.com/?p=16539#comment-8148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8129&quot;&gt;Hunter Allen&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh man for some reason I thought Sputnik was 1952. Not sure how I got that far off. I should&#039;ve paid closer attention to &quot;We Didn&#039;t Start the Fire,&quot; I guess. I&#039;ve slightly rewritten that section.

Orson Welles&#039; War of the Worlds broadcast was in 1938 so I guess paranoia of alien monsters from the sky has been a latent part of our culture for a long time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8129">Hunter Allen</a>.</p>
<p>Oh man for some reason I thought Sputnik was 1952. Not sure how I got that far off. I should&#8217;ve paid closer attention to &#8220;We Didn&#8217;t Start the Fire,&#8221; I guess. I&#8217;ve slightly rewritten that section.</p>
<p>Orson Welles&#8217; War of the Worlds broadcast was in 1938 so I guess paranoia of alien monsters from the sky has been a latent part of our culture for a long time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hunter Allen		</title>
		<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hunter Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 03:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thegoodsreviews.com/?p=16539#comment-8129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a good point about the flying ants that didn&#039;t occur to me.  (I, er, stopped at &quot;well, ants do fly, though truck-sized ones could not.&quot;)  UFO sightings were certainly already in swing (the Invasion of Washington occurred in 1952), and that&#039;s got to be Cold War related in some way, though Sputnik didn&#039;t happen on the back of an R-7 missile till 1957.  And this along with some early &quot;nuclear apocalypse&quot; movies it&#039;s gotten me curious as to the timeline of the Cold War in regards to at what point Americans got it into their heads that nuclear war could kill us all--because I feel like it might be well in advance of the fact, as the USSR had no means of full-scale nuclear strikes on the continental United States (except maybe suicide bombing missions) until about 1960.  &quot;Duck and Cover&quot; was produced in 1952!  I guess it was &quot;as soon as the Soviets had significant numbers and types of nuclear weapons at all&quot; and I suppose that makes sense, given that appreciation of Soviet capabilities naturally tilted towards worst-case-scenario thinking.

Anyway, this is a really good movie but that reset just to do the first half over again in a different setting puts some hard limits on how good it can be.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good point about the flying ants that didn&#8217;t occur to me.  (I, er, stopped at &#8220;well, ants do fly, though truck-sized ones could not.&#8221;)  UFO sightings were certainly already in swing (the Invasion of Washington occurred in 1952), and that&#8217;s got to be Cold War related in some way, though Sputnik didn&#8217;t happen on the back of an R-7 missile till 1957.  And this along with some early &#8220;nuclear apocalypse&#8221; movies it&#8217;s gotten me curious as to the timeline of the Cold War in regards to at what point Americans got it into their heads that nuclear war could kill us all&#8211;because I feel like it might be well in advance of the fact, as the USSR had no means of full-scale nuclear strikes on the continental United States (except maybe suicide bombing missions) until about 1960.  &#8220;Duck and Cover&#8221; was produced in 1952!  I guess it was &#8220;as soon as the Soviets had significant numbers and types of nuclear weapons at all&#8221; and I suppose that makes sense, given that appreciation of Soviet capabilities naturally tilted towards worst-case-scenario thinking.</p>
<p>Anyway, this is a really good movie but that reset just to do the first half over again in a different setting puts some hard limits on how good it can be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Stalcup		</title>
		<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Stalcup]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 15:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thegoodsreviews.com/?p=16539#comment-8113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8095&quot;&gt;ED&lt;/a&gt;.

An ED comment is always welcome, never taken for granted!

It is pretty odd to see Davey Crockett in a supporting role, isn&#039;t it? And this is the year before that movie was made.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8095">ED</a>.</p>
<p>An ED comment is always welcome, never taken for granted!</p>
<p>It is pretty odd to see Davey Crockett in a supporting role, isn&#8217;t it? And this is the year before that movie was made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ED		</title>
		<link>https://thegoodsreviews.com/them-1954/#comment-8095</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ED]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2025 15:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://thegoodsreviews.com/?p=16539#comment-8095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to pop in and apologise for not having posted in a while - I’m always reluctant to read reviews for films I have not seen, the better to form my own opinions and avoid spoilers - but can only call the mental image of Disney’s “King of the Wild Frontier” (Mr Fess Parker) being confronted by GIANT ANTS a most rewarding return for mere politeness.<img src="https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/17.0.2/72x72/1f604.png" alt="😄" class="wp-smiley" style="height: 1em; max-height: 1em;" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to pop in and apologise for not having posted in a while &#8211; I’m always reluctant to read reviews for films I have not seen, the better to form my own opinions and avoid spoilers &#8211; but can only call the mental image of Disney’s “King of the Wild Frontier” (Mr Fess Parker) being confronted by GIANT ANTS a most rewarding return for mere politeness.😄</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
