Recent Comments

  • Dan Stalcup on Jason X (2001):

    Fair; I know you are more reverent to the power of the Friday the 13ths than I am, and it’s…

    Oct 12, 11:45


  • Hunter Allen on Jason X (2001):

    I’m still offput by how self-mocking it is, and how it has no interest in the ideas about rationality vs.…

    Oct 11, 12:03


  • Patrick Drake on Gangs of London, Season 1, Episode 4:

    Such a great series hope they will continue 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

    Oct 7, 07:51


  • Dan Stalcup on Honey, I Blew Up the Kid (1992):

    It’s certainly possible I should have rated this a tick higher, but I wanted to differentiate it from the first,…

    Oct 6, 07:47


  • Hunter Allen on Honey, I Blew Up the Kid (1992):

    Aw, you know, I like this one too. (And I didn’t watch it for the first time till I was,…

    Oct 6, 03:34


  • Dan Stalcup on Honey, I Blew Up the Kid (1992):

    Man, you’re right, I forgot to mention Lloyd Bridges as the old eccentric rich guy. Enjoyed his performance.

    Oct 4, 19:25


  • Dan Stalcup on Psycho (1960):

    I can’t say I’ve ever met anyone who has seen only the Van Sant remake! You’re in rare territory! But…

    Oct 4, 19:16


  • ED on Psycho (1960):

    Hidey-ho, Murderinos! Somewhat to my embarrassment I’m mainly popping in to confess that, while I’ve seen at least one of…

    Oct 3, 13:09


  • ED on Honey, I Blew Up the Kid (1992):

    This seems an eminently fair review – I have warm memories of watching this film on video cassette as a…

    Oct 3, 12:39


  • Dan Stalcup on Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989):

    I’ll probably catch at least some of them at some point. People running scared from dinosaur attacks seems like a…

    Oct 1, 09:58


  • ED on Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989):

    I can’t decide if that makes you a lucky, lucky man or someone who has missed out on rare pleasures:…

    Sep 30, 05:53


  • Dan Stalcup on Them! (1954):

    Oh man for some reason I thought Sputnik was 1952. Not sure how I got that far off. I should’ve…

    Sep 28, 12:21


  • Dan Stalcup on Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989):

    I used the term “playground” but “theme park attraction” is spot on for the feeling of the movie — in…

    Sep 28, 12:06


  • Hunter Allen on Them! (1954):

    That’s a good point about the flying ants that didn’t occur to me. (I, er, stopped at “well, ants do…

    Sep 27, 22:41


  • Hunter Allen on Honey, I Shrunk the Kids (1989):

    I hadn’t run across the Candy factoid before. No, no, he would just have been all wrong. But I don’t…

    Sep 27, 22:23


  • Dan Stalcup on Them! (1954):

    An ED comment is always welcome, never taken for granted! It is pretty odd to see Davey Crockett in a…

    Sep 27, 10:47


  • ED on Them! (1954):

    Just wanted to pop in and apologise for not having posted in a while – I’m always reluctant to read…

    Sep 26, 10:28


  • dennis on Gangs of London, Season 3, Episode 5:

    what a great fucking review. thank you so much. cheers from Switzerland 🙂

    Sep 25, 17:20


  • Dan Stalcup on Happer’s Comet (2022):

    And it’s only 62 minutes 😲

    Sep 24, 18:42


  • Dan Stalcup on Happer’s Comet (2022):

    Had to look that one up but, man, yeah, fits perfect.

    Sep 24, 18:42


  • Dan Stalcup on Weapons (2025):

    I realize I sound exactly how so many of the reviewers and podcasters sounded about Barbarian, so maybe take my…

    Sep 24, 18:41


  • Hunter Allen on Happer’s Comet (2022):

    I’ll admit it sounds kinda cool. Would’ve gone with “Prayer of the roller boys”!

    Sep 24, 01:22


  • Andrew Milne on Weapons (2025):

    “What’s new here (and handled more cleverly than in Barbarian) is how the jarring perspective shifts elevate the story.” Now,…

    Sep 23, 10:23


  • Andrew Milne on Happer’s Comet (2022):

    I’m intrigued, at any rate.

    Sep 22, 17:48


  • Dan Stalcup on Weapons (2025):

    I don’t think it really requires Barbarian, though for me it was instructive in Weapons showing the way the impulses…

    Sep 22, 16:48


  • Hunter Allen on Weapons (2025):

    Been kind of on the fence on this, mainly because I’m for reasons I can’t even begin to articulate I…

    Sep 20, 18:45


  • Dan Stalcup on The Last Laugh (1924):

    Kirk – I completely agree. It really sucks you in. I remember feeling the way I feel when reading a…

    Sep 18, 07:49


  • Kirk on The Last Laugh (1924):

    The lack of intertitles and the camera work makes it stand apart from other silent films. I would argue, due…

    Sep 18, 07:16


  • Hunter Allen on F1 (2025):

    He’s the Spirit of Motorsports. His work was done.

    Sep 15, 20:43


  • Graciela Pezzo on Materialists (2025):

    Love prevails and heals, in the language of a K-drama or rom-com. The pacing and dialogue allow for long moments…

    Sep 12, 11:20


  • Dan Stalcup on F1 (2025):

    I’m definitely on the fence. I didn’t mention it here but also thought Brad Pitt’s final beat was kinda dumb…

    Sep 11, 12:33


  • Hunter Allen on F1 (2025):

    I was aware Spiderhead though I thought it came out before Maverick; in fairness, I was *almost* right. It was…

    Sep 9, 21:49


  • Dan Stalcup on First Love (1939):

    Yep, I imagine Durbin’s years were peaceful and happy compared to Garland’s. Like the recent Babylon explored, the industry of…

    Sep 9, 20:34


  • Dan Stalcup on First Love (1939):

    @Hunter: 😭 @ED: “the stuff that dreams are made of” indeed

    Sep 9, 20:33


  • Dan Stalcup on Happy Feet Two (2011):

    Well, like I said, I think it sounds more interesting than it actually is, but, yeah, it’s pretty weird and…

    Sep 9, 19:51


  • ED on The Thief of Bagdad (1924):

    To be precise it wasn’t a modern Big Screen – this was in a concert hall rigged up as a…

    Sep 9, 06:32


  • ED on First Love (1939):

    Reading this article, one cannot help but suspect that Ms Durbin was the lucky one – immortal fame and a…

    Sep 9, 06:29


  • ED on First Love (1939):

    At least it gave us an intellectual grounding for coping with an all-too-often broke down and morally grubby world…

    Sep 9, 06:18


  • Hunter Allen on First Love (1939):

    “noirs remain more popular than ‘30s musicals” And just look at where it’s got us, right?

    Sep 7, 23:44


  • Hunter Allen on Happy Feet Two (2011):

    You kinda sold me on this with the krill, you know. (I’d actually kinda forgotten these two movies existed, honestly.)

    Sep 7, 23:43


  • Dan Stalcup on The Thief of Bagdad (1924):

    I was excited to see this among your tens. “Dreaminess” is an element of this I don’t think I properly…

    Sep 6, 09:21


  • Dan Stalcup on The Thief of Bagdad (1924):

    I’m super envious of seeing this on a big screen (or for that matter ANY silent film). Now that you…

    Sep 6, 09:20


  • Hunter Allen on The Thief of Bagdad (1924):

    Man, wish I could see this in a theater sometime. But yeah, this is really quite great. (I will agree…

    Sep 5, 21:32


  • ED on The Thief of Bagdad (1924):

    One can proudly say that I saw THE THIEF OF BAGHDAD and the original BEN HUR (No, not that one,…

    Sep 5, 14:53


  • ED on KPop Demon Hunters (2025):

    Also, there’s more than one member of the Band, so there’s plenty of room to explore their respective personal dramas…

    Aug 27, 09:25


  • ED on KPop Demon Hunters (2025):

    I’m not actually registered on Letterboxd (Only so many websites I can post on regularly without spending more time typing…

    Aug 27, 09:23


  • Dan Stalcup on Loser (2000):

    You know, I haven’t thought about the fact that I haven’t seen Biggs in much from the past 15 years,…

    Aug 26, 10:01


  • Dan Stalcup on Loser (2000):

    In 2021, I binged what felt like a ridiculous number of Allen films in chronological order, and still made it…

    Aug 26, 09:58


  • Dan Stalcup on KPop Demon Hunters (2025):

    I think I read that they’re eyeing sequels! Given its massive popularity, I would be more surprised if we see…

    Aug 26, 09:52


  • Dan Stalcup on KPop Demon Hunters (2025):

    Haha, I see you follow me on Letterboxd? Not sure if I follow you back and just haven’t connected a…

    Aug 26, 09:47



Dan is the founder and head critic of The Goods. Follow Dan on Letterboxd. Join the Discord for updates and discussion.