Of all the moral panics from the last half century, Dungeons and Dragons is one of the most inexplicable to me. As far as I can tell from a brief Wikipedia dive, two kids who happened to play D&D were involved in tragic deaths about ten years apart. And that’s it. It makes as much sense as demonizing toaster ovens. (Though I suppose toaster ovens don’t involve pretending to be elves and rolling dice to kill imaginary orcs.)
Mazes and Monsters — the TV movie starring vehicle for a young Tom Hanks (his first starring role) — turns that D&D panic into a self-serious psychodrama. Its complete lack of understanding of D&D and LARPing is hilarious. The movie makes the game seem like a satanic cabal, with candle-lit rooms and hoods and half-whispered fantasy words.
The production values are slightly better than I would have expected for a TV movie, and the cast is surprisingly engaging. But that’s a pretty low bar; the premise and script are completely ludicrous.
The movie’s most memorable moments are so-bad-its-good hamminess. Hanks is delightful as someone going through a psychotic episode. I’m not sure he consciously knows that this material is camp, but it’s over-the-top bliss nonetheless.
I won’t sugar-coat it: This is a bad movie, with long boring stretches and an off-putting air of self-righteousness. But the moments of absurdity — goofy fantasy costumes, a World Trade Center suicide attempt, Hanks cry-shouting about a dead brother — have some gonzo charm.
- Review Series: Tom Hanks
Is It Good?
Not Good (2/8)
Note: This review was originally published elsewhere. Please excuse brevity or inconsistencies in style. If you have questions or feedback, please leave a comment or contact me.
Dan is the founder and head critic of The Goods. Follow Dan on Letterboxd. Join the Discord for updates and discussion.