Categories
Legacy Review

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920)

One fun part of my tour through movie history is experiencing various film movements and trends. In the the late 1910s-1920s, a bunch of German filmmakers essentially invented the tone and aesthetics of horror movies amidst postwar defeat drudgery in a movement called “German expressionism.” These films used anti-realism and theatricality to heighten the storytelling and mood, and shared the mentality of the expressionist movement of visual art that sought to capture subjective experiences not objective realities.

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari, one such film, is an absolute masterpiece of production design. Everything is sharp edges and jagged angles. It’s truly unlike anything I’ve ever seen, relentless with disorienting and imbalanced settings. It’s not that the film builds to a few iconic shots with this dreamlike aesthetic — it’s that every single shot of the film has that effect.

The use of lighting and shadows play a crucial role, too. Bleak, sharp shadows build the sense of a world in disarray, with the very essence of modern life dangerous and falling apart at the seams. Many sets also have a heavily artificial, painted look that expands the expressionistic feeling, as if this film is a Edvard Munch painting brought to life.

The story fits perfectly with these brilliant and evocative visual ideas: A mysterious carny by the name of Dr. Caligari has a coffin with a man named Cesare in a deep, deathlike sleep. Dr. Caligari’s carnival trick is raising Cesare to sleep-walking life.

Sure enough, as soon as Dr. Caligari’s show premiers, people in the village start mysteriously being stabbed in the night, including the friend of Francis, our protagonist. As the plot progresses, dual realities begin to emerge — a false one constructed by the modern institutions, where an ordinary local thug is doing the murders, and one constructed by Francis, which blames Caligari. The truth of Dr. Caligari’s villainy comes to light, and his sleep-walking minion Cesare is stopped just before murdering Francis’s lover, Jane. Worse, we learn that Caligari is the director of the local mental hospital and asylum, where he plucked Cesare from — the very man who should be curing the modern poisons of the world is perpetrating them.

That would seem to be it, but (spoiler!) in a twist ending from the framing story, we learn that Francis, himself, is an asylum patient — and he’d hallucinated the whole story. Every character we had seen existed in a different form in the asylum, including a benevolent version of Dr. Caligari.

It’s an astonishing final twist, if a bit old-hat these days; “it was all a dream”. But it’s also a troublesome ending; it somewhat undercuts every heightened visual and storytelling element in the rest of the film: That modern society and corrupted institutions are bringing us to darkness in a modern world that’s increasingly inhuman and disorienting, and those we should trust are the ones tearing us down and constructing false realities. By making the human center of the film the actual lunatic, and the evil doctor in fact a kindly caretaker, those concepts are flipped on their head in a way that undermines their impact.

Nonetheless, it’s a riveting horror story from start to end.

If everything about the film’s aesthetic and cinematography is unparalleled brilliance and innovation, the camera angles themselves is quite mundane. The camera is still essentially the entire time, featuring mostly medium shots, as if we’re watching a stage. Though this perhaps heightens the film’s theatricality, it somewhat diminishes its cinematic quality. I also think the movie overuses irises, or drawing our focus by blacking out all but a specific portion of the frame. Nonetheless, the production design is so good that it easily overcomes the basic direction; the film’s overall visual effect is truly remarkable and unique.

While a few of my reactions were mixed, I can say without reservation that this film is a treasure and worth watching by anyone who enjoys horror or art films. It’s certainly the first feature-length film in my tour through film history that I’ve enjoyed purely as a movie buff, not historian, and would consider watching again for pleasure.

(I’m attempting to watch 1001 Films to See Before Your Die in chronological order. This is film number 6. Up next is yet another DW Griffith film, Broken Blossoms. Thankfully, it’s easily his shortest yet on this list. By the way, given various orderings in various lists and publications, I’ve decided to follow this master list. It includes films from every edition of the 1001 list, so stretches out to over 1200 films.)

Is It Good?

Very Good (6/8)

A few words on "Is It Good?" ratings for early cinema.

Note: This review was originally published elsewhere. Please excuse brevity or inconsistencies in style. If you have questions or feedback, please leave a comment or contact me.


Follow Dan on Letterboxd and join the Discord for updates and discussion.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.